A Federally legislated ,rail industry, INSURANCE plan is proposed  …. a ‘response’ to the  Lac Mégantic rail tragedy..
While governments and rail  industry chose to dither …many claimed that  transport of oil products (in older rail tankers)  is a risky plan.Railways jumped at the opportunity to increase revenue by transport of oil in existing rail cars –.
Insurance is one welcome component…but we need to see  parallel , employee training material ,and design standards for rails and tankers !?
Sadly,insurance cannot  ‘pay ‘for the Lac Megantic disaster—better  to PREVENT oil related  incidents ,where there are obvious public safety  issues !
Two BC issues ; 
1.Create  a similar insurance plan (and equipment upgrading and employee training plans) for all ‘oil transport’ facilities—including railways,PIPELINES and TANKERS ,traversing our lands and waters .
2.’Adjust’ existing ,ill-conceived,BC pipeline proposals—to reduce the probability of an Exxon Valdes incident-–because we dithered  ! 
That inevitable bitumen tanker spill ,suggests we should should not UNNECESSARILY INCREASE bitumen tanker traffic in our busy waters when there is a simple alternative pipelines plan !
Let the leaders LEAD or do they prefer  to tally the cost of dithering ?!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s