WHY WAS ‘MUST ISSUE’ EXCLUDED ?

..my comments focus on issues NOT COVERED in “Playbook’
Discussion 4: After reviewing the full suite of proposed legislation, regulation and policy in the intentions paper, do you have anything to add or comments about gaps, additions or what be done differently and why?
In my opinion ,
1.these new regulations should include a requirement for any wannabe proponent of  new oil transport  facilities to include an  introductory  report explaining how many potentially affected  communities  were consulted, to show that they have  communicated and gained some idea as to the likelihood of public acceptance of the proposed location of facilities…The entire exercise of a hearing is to bring something forward that is in the public/national interest..Enbridge and Kinder Morgan ‘conveniently ‘’ ignored the public input before filing their applications ..and look where that ‘got us!’ One government thrown out   and ..the new Federal government has done little ..except make a few hollow promises ,so far with no results…..
The NEB,were offered these shallow proposals and  had no option but to issue recommendations to government with hundreds of CONDITIONS..
These proposed BC government amendments should include some direction about searching for the best(scientifically) evaluated  facilities (pipelines,tankers)LOCATIONS to ensure that ,with the best science, the proposed  location  will minimize the probability,and the potential of a product spill…and then these ‘nuts and bolts details’ of this proposed ‘amendment ‘ then fit nicely ..
If the ‘’ ‘best’  location issue is dealt with elsewhere..then at least direct the proponents to the appropriate legislation/regulation ! But be sure to include this location evaluation as a must…that must preclude any wannabe pipeline,tankers facilities proposals !
2. I did not see ‘bitumen’ or ‘dilbit’ included in list ?
The proposed amendments in the bill would replace existing spill response provisions in EMA with new requirements for preparing for, responding to and recovering from environmental emergencies.
… the framework for the Province to develop and implement new rules for a comprehensive spill preparedness, response and recovery regulatory regime.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s